Citizen Journalism: Is there controversy
between the Professional Journalist and the Citizen Journalist?
From
all of the required readings this week on Citizen Journalism, in an article
written by Mary Grace Antony, Citizen Journalism was best described as “the act
of a citizen, or a group of citizens, playing an active role in the process of
collecting, reporting, analyzing and disseminating news and information…[in
order to] provide independent, reliable, accurate, wide-ranging and relevant
information that a democracy requires.”
So as we look further into what Citizen Journalism is we will touch on
an issue that may be prevalent within the journalism arena. I gathered from looking at some published videos
and other readings about the citizen journalist that there may be some
differences in opinion or rift between the professional journalist and the
citizen journalist.
What is Citizen Journalism?
Even
though the above-mentioned description of citizen journalism seems to be very
accurate it certainly is a mouthful and a lot to analyze. In looking more into what the citizen
journalist is I found another definition of the citizen journalist that I like
better. According to a journalist by the
name of Tony Rogers, “Put very simply, citizen journalism is when private
individuals do essentially what professional reporters do- report
information. That information can take
many forms, from a podcast editorial to a report about a governmental meeting
on a blog. It can include text,
pictures, audio and video. But it’s
basically all about communicating information of some kind.” I found this definition to resonate more at
home with me because it was very simplistic.
Often time when I am trying to absorb the meaning of something keeping
it simple and to the point helps with bringing understanding to what the writer
is saying.
So
getting back to the topic at hand, the Citizen Journalist, in essence does the
same thing as the professional journalist but they just don’t have the
professional title. One other important thing about citizen journalism is that
I think it is primarily found on-line. These writings may come in the form of, for
example, you might see written comments about a governmental or political group
meeting that has taken place, or you could see postings pointing out errors or
bias from newspaper articles or mainstream media. Or you might take a digital
photo of something or some event that is going on within your town or city that
is newsworthy and post it online. Or you
might video tape a something of similar nature and post it on a site like
YouTube, Snap Chat, Video Tube, or Pinterest.
All these might be considered acts of journalism, even if they don’t go
beyond simple observation at the scene of an important event or breaking news
headlines.
When
individuals without professional journalism training are allowed to use the same
tools of modern technology and the global distribution of the Internet to
create, and add to the conversations of the mainstream media and offer other
perspectives outside of the mainstream as well. These individuals can sometimes
begin to share information that may or may not be completely accurate. It is so important that, as bloggers we
should do our due diligence and research, analyze, and relay, to the best of
our ability, the most reliable information we have. And even if there is any doubt in what we are
reporting, then just say that so that readers will know a particular piece of
information may or may not be totally accurate. There can be such an overwhelming feeling of
frustration when bloggers are talking about the same thing and saying something
entirely different than the next. What
kind of affect does this bring to the world of journalism? Because this whole world of journalism was
once a territorial unit that belonged to well established journalists and media
companies. There is some controversy
because many professional journalists believe that only a trained journalist
can understand the difficulties and unpleasant experiences that can be
associated with reporting the news. They
also believe that there has to be a certain level of ethics involved in
reporting the news. One of the main misconceptions
behind citizen journalism is that mainstream media reporters and producers are
not the exclusive center of knowledge on a subject- the audience knows more
collectively than the reporter alone.
Now, many of these media outlets are trying to harness the knowledge of
their audience either through comments at the end of stories they post online
or by creating citizen journalist contributors sources for stories.
Because
of the web there are so many avenues we can use to provide our topic of
discussion and capture whatever events we want. Through all of the
internet-based and other wireless technologies it has made it so easy for the
world, with a great level of freedom, to be able to get our point of view
across to anyone in the world. Today we
live in a time frame where information is available from multiple platforms,
and sharing information is easier than ever before. With the onset of the internet many
individuals can gain access to websites, social networks, and blogging tools to
help people write about themselves and stories they come into contact with, all
readily available to publish and share online.
These tools are also available to the citizen journalist. And because there has been great importance
acquired by social networks and blogs as sources of information, people have
made them a permanent part of the puzzle, one which the traditional media must
deal with. Opinions remain divided about
the situation but there are those that reject the possibility of
non-professional voices but nevertheless they are here to stay. Without a doubt, social networks, blogs and
other online tools have made their existence.
There is still a need for information professionals to publish well-prepared
and relevant news stories to the public.
No comments:
Post a Comment